The New 52: Detective Comics

After coming off the high of Animal Man, let's get this one out of the way. Before the relaunch, Tony Daniel had kind of an erratic run as writer/artist on Batman where he covered a lot of different ground He returned The Riddler to being a villain--which is fine because his reformed period didn't seem to lead to much--and gave him a girl who's allegedly his daughter to run around with called Enigma. As to what her point is, she doesn't seem to have much of on yet. He did an arc with I-Ching, an old Wonder Woman character, centered around a Maguffin called the Beholder Mask that was okay. Essentially, the stories were mostly forgettable, but not acutely terrible. Now, Daniel is serving as again both writer and artist here on Detective Comics, and this is, in fact, terrible.

Even with the ever expanding supporting cast, Batman is by his nature an insular character, and Batman books are often heavy with internal narration. It can certainly be done well. Frank Miller, obviously, pretty much made a name for himself and created much of the modern idea of Batman using the device, ("Two ribs broken... must not pass out... use the pain!") and even though some find it overrated, I've always loved Jeph Loeb's heavily narration-boxed Long Halloween as well. That brings me to the narration at the beginning of Detective #1 Here's a sample: "His modus operandi changes with the wind... and it's been windy in Gotham City." Really? That's what Batman's thinking? Since when does Batman think like David Carruso sounds at the start of a CSI: Miami episode? The comic gets more bizarre from there. Batman tells us through narration that he's been pursuing the Joker for five years, (according to DC, five years is the amount of time Batman's been active in the new reboot, which doesn't seem like enough time for everything that's still in continuity to have happ--you know what, it's comics I'm just going to go with it) and yet later it's as if Batman is entirely unfamiliar with him. For some reason, Daniel feels the need to have the Joker be naked as he's killing a dude, which leads us later to Batman thinking to himself "What was the Joker doing naked? Does he always remove his clothes first?" Wait, what? In the five years he's been pursuing the Joker, has he never been up close to him? How would he not have determined this at some point in the past five years already? And would a serial killer having a sexualized component to what they do really be that confusing to Batman? Can Batman get a torrent of Red Dragon on his Bat-computer?

The story seems set up to be a reintroduction of the iconic and unending conflict between the Batman and the Joker. Good vs. evil, rationality vs. insanity, order vs. chaos and all that. And yet, this is quickly upstaged by all the gratuitous gore in the book, and the Joker himself, the guy who's supposed to be the villain-of villains in Batman lore, is upstaged by a new character based on cheap grotesquery. On page 4, we see a guy wearing human skin over his own face, and before we have any idea who it is, we see the Joker biting out his own throat. It happens in five panels. There's no tension or genuine horror in it, it's just gross for grossness sake. By the end of #1, Batman has caught the Joker and thrown him back into Arkham, as he always does, although Daniel is not done yet. Our as yet unnamed new villain breaks into the Joker's cell. The Joker tells him "get on with it", the mystery man says "This will hurt--a lot." and in a last page reveal, we see the skin of the Joker's face nailed up on the wall, with the rest of the Joker off-panel saying, "That was fangasmic!" Ugh.

Issue #2 is more of the same. Bruce Wayne bones a just-introduced reporter named Charlotte after the unbelievable sexual tension set up by these lines:

"My eyes are up here."
"I can see that, and they're shooting daggers!"
"Then kiss me before you bleed to death."

Shakespeare is reborn in Tony Daniel! If anything of substance is to come as this relationship it'll be in a latter issue. Bruce swaps back into the cape and cowl and sets out to find our new villain, who's revealed to be The Dollmaker, and he ends up looking a lot like Ragdoll from Secret Six, wish makes me opine even more for a better comic than this. Turns out that he has a whole slew of henchman that all have creepy skin masks on their faces, and there's a creepy girl in a nurse outfit speaking as if she's his daughter talking about cutting out Batman's eyes. The last page reveal here is Batman clutching what looks like Jim Gordon, only all patched up with a bunch of different grafts of skin on his face and not looking in any way alive. This reveal at least has something of an "I honestly have no idea how this ends well" element to it, although knowing how dumb this comic has been to this point, I think it's entirely likely that this isn't actually Gordan, and The Dollmaker just made up an already dead guy to look like him.

Between this, and Batman: The Dark Knight #1, which is also written and penciled by one person (David Finch), and which is similarly uninspiring, I'm thinking DC should stay away from letting one person have free reign on Batman books for awhile (although, theoretically, somebody is supposed to be editing these, right?) Daniel's work here through two issues is truly pretty distasteful. I'm a grown man with no kids, and so I don't really care about how violent a comic book is, so long as there's a point to it. Scott Snyder's recent Detective Comics run before the reboot featuring centering around The Joker and James Gordon is notable in comparison to this both because it manages to tell a story with the Joker and another antagonist concurrently without the Joker seeming to be completely upstaged, and for its use of violence that actually has a purpose. There's a last panel reveal in one of Snyder's issues that's really about as graphic as the face nailed to the wall, but it's violence that's used quickly and effectively in a genuinely terrifying way. The violence here is splattered everywhere up close and personal to the point where it becomes meaningless. Batman comics should have a healthy amount of darkness to them, but they should never, ever be torture porn. This was an all-around awful reading experience and it's getting dropped from my pulls. Luckily, Scott Snyder is writing Batman, and if his first issue is any indication, he hasn't lost anything since his Detective run.

The New 52: Animal Man

**SOME SPOILERS**

I haven't been reading comics as long as some, but I've been reading them for a while now, and to this point I've managed to not really encounter much of anything Animal Man related. I'm aware of some of his history, notably the Grant Morrison Vertigo run in which he gains awareness of the fact that he's a fictional character, and has a conversation with Morrison himself. I'm also aware that Jim Lemere writes a current Vertigo series, Sweet Tooth, which has garnered some acclaim, but haven't actually read any of it save preview pages in the back of other Vertigo books. And I hadn't heard of artist Travel Foreman at all. But I'd heard nothing but good things about the book both from comic site and from friends, and so I felt I had to check it out, and I'm glad I did. I'm completely sold on the concept. It's going on my pull list.

Page 1 of issue #1 gives you the starting point for the series in the form of a fictitious magazine article, ala those in Watchmen. Buddy Baker used to be a superhero and now he's a family man who's trying to break into acting. Buddy still has a itch for crime-fighting through, and so when an insane man is holding hostages at the hospital, Buddy flies--'cause he can do that--to the scene to punch the dude out. Afterward though, Buddy starts bleeding profusely from his eyes, a symptom which the doctors on hard are unable to discern a medical explanation for, and so here's our hook for the book.

The early pages with Buddy and his family are decent, but it's the back half of #1 that really will really convince you that this is the start of something great. Foreman's art, while not uninteresting at the outset, really gets turned up to a new level of detail when Buddy gets pulled into a cryptic dream sequence. The use of color and the creative paneling (on one page, different images are separated by the sprawling roots of a tree) remind me a lot of what makes Batwoman so enjoyable and so different compared to most superhero books. The entirely dream sequence is genuinely creepy and leaves you genuinely confused as to where the book is going, but in the best possible way. The last page of #1, back in the real world, ends with the reveal, that Maxine, Buddy's daughter has apparently managed to raise several skeletal animals from the dead. Again, super-creepy and super-effective in making you want to figure out what's going on.

Issue #2 manages to keep all of #1's momentum going, as Buddy's mysterious hemorrhaging gives way to artery-like tattoos suddenly appearing on his skin which Maxine weirdly is able to identify as a map to "the red place." This leads into another surrealist sequence where Buddy and Maxine travel (in the real world? in a dream? we don't know) to something between a giant tree and a giant network of arteries, like those that manifesting themselves on Buddy that seems to represent something like the heart of all animal life. Foreman's art is again wonderfully imaginative here, culminating in a two page spread where Maxine tells Buddy to "let it take us into the red," and Buddy's face begins to morph into some shape that I can't even begin to describe. The Hunters Three, the villains of this arc, though their origins and motives are not yet clear, are three different and equally grotesque creations.

The best thing about Animal Man is that I don't have much of an idea where this opening arc is going to take me next, but that it makes me want to find out. Lemire and Foreman have taken a C-list superhero character and decided to reintroduce him by having him discover the nature of all living things in the DCU. It's a sort of broadening a character's mythos like what Geoff Johns did starting with Green Lantern: Rebirth, but this is much more interesting, original, and seemingly must more profound. I've bought into this hook, line, and sinker, and highly recommend it.

New Blog

Howdy. This is a brand spankin' new blog. I used to write another blog, which I called A Briefcase Full of Blues. What I wrote about was pretty all over the place, and that might be the case here as well. I'm going to start off writing about comics, specifically some of the comics I'm currently reading that are part of DC's "New 52" relaunch. Beyond that though, it might branch off into other areas. I watch a ton of movies, a ton of sports, and certain niches of TV. On occasion I manage to read an actual black-text-on-white-paper book as well. I'd say any or all of the above would be fair game. I'm going to try and keep this updated more regularly than Briefcase was, which ended up being very sporadic after a while. Anyway, not much for introductions, hopefully my actual posts will explain what sort of blog this'll be.